The Counterfactual Meaning of the Abl Rule
نویسنده
چکیده
The Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz rule assigns probabilities to quantum measurement results at time t on the condition that the system is prepared in a given way at t1 < t and found in a given state at t2 > t. The question whether the rule can also be applied counterfactually to the case where no measurement is performed at the intermediate time t has recently been the subject of controversy. I argue that the counterfactual meaning may be understood in terms of the true value of an observable at t. Such a value cannot be empirically determined for, by stipulation, the measurement that would yield it is not performed. Nevertheless, it may or may not be well-defined depending on one’s proposed interpretation of quantum mechanics. Various examples are discussed illustrating what can be asserted at the intermediate time without running into contradictions.
منابع مشابه
Closing a Loophole in the Case Against the Counterfactual Usage of the ABL Rule
A currently discussed interpretation of quantum theory, Time-Symmetrized Quantum Theory, makes certain claims about the properties of systems between preand postselection measurements. These claims are based on a counterfactual usage of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule for calculating the probabilities of measurement outcomes between such measurements. It has been argued by several aut...
متن کاملComment on Mohrhoff ’ s “ What quantum mechanics is trying to tell us ”
Mohrhoff's use of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule for time-symmetric objective probabilities, as related to counterfactual intervening measurements between pre-and post-selection, is problematic. The ABL rule was formulated on the assumption that such intervening measurements are actually made, and would therefore correspond to what Mohrhoff is calling " subjective " probabilities. Ul...
متن کاملua nt - p h / 98 07 03 7 v 3 1 0 Fe b 19 99 The Three - Box “ Paradox ” and other Reasons to Reject the Counterfactual Usage of the ABL Rule
An apparent paradox proposed by Aharonov and Vaidman in which a single particle can be found with certainty in two (or more) boxes is analyzed by way of a simple thought experiment. It is found that the apparent paradox arises from an invalid counterfactual usage of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule, and effectively attributes conflicting properties not to the same particle but to diffe...
متن کاملTime-symmetrized Quantum Theory, Counterfactuals, and 'advanced Action'
Recent authors have raised objections to the counterfactual interpretation of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule of time symmetrized quantum theory (TSQT). I distinguish between two different readings of the ABL rule, counterfactual and non-counterfactual, and confirm that TSQT advocate L. Vaidman is employing the counterfactual reading to which these authors object. Vaidman has responde...
متن کاملResolving the Three-Box Paradox
An apparent paradox proposed by Aharonov and Vaidman in which a single particle can be found with certainty in two (or more) boxes is analyzed. It is found that the paradox arises from a counterfactual usage of the Aharonov-Bergmann-Lebowitz (ABL) rule. The paradox is resolved by observing that the counterfactual usage of the rule is, in general, not valid. 1. Background. The Aharonov-Bergmann-...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008